Placement
Description:
Attributes:
IDs for the placement:
ID- this identifies court, case and defendant
CaseNumber- this identifies only the case
LitigantNumber- this identifies both case and defendant (in case there is more than one on the case)
ID sub-segments and their meanings
Role Code, Role, RoleDescription and Role Sequence- see LitigantDetails
Identity-related attributes- see Identity
Type- this should indicate a "real" name, not an alias.
FullName
Gender
DateOfBirth
Key dates- see LitigantDetails
InitialOpenDate
InitialCloseDate
ReopenDate
RecloseDate
Key Receivables attributes
Receivable- AccountName and the three following attributes relate to the Collection fees payable to the State's Attorney or their collection agency. This is provided so that the Subscriber can verify that any collection fee amount indicated by the court is correct, given the InitialCollectionsBalance on the placement. Note that when the A/R is adjusted to reflect new amounts not yet delinquent, the collection fees won't change. The agency may wish to call the court to make sure it wasn't a mistake. When a case has been properly referred.
AccountName- indicates "SA Collections"
AccountCode
AmountDue- this is the total collection fee due
AmountPaid- if any payments have been taken since referral, this will indicate how much was applied to the collections fees.
Contact data attributes
Offense data
Offense dates attribute- if the case has multiple charges, a comma-delimited list is provided
Charges attribute- if the case has multiple charges, a comma-delimited list is provided
ArrestingAgency- the name of the law enforcement agency' associated with the RelatedActor referenced in the ArrestData on the case
ReferralDate (added in Sep. 2013)- this attribute preserves the original referral date even when the CollectionsDate changes in the unlikely event that a payment or adjustment between the referral and the date you first pull data containing the placement.
InitialCollectionsBalance- because this balance isn't calculated until the end of the day on which the case was referred, it can be negative. See Note below for how this can happen.,
Children:
Examples:
Notes:
Why is the InitialCollectionsBalance negative? if the court refers cases which have open warrants (as when they had previously been arresting people in order to get them to pay), negative balances can result. Here is a scenario:
Day 1: Judge issues a warrant. Because the case balance is $100, the judge sets bond at $100
Day 2: Defendant makes a payment of $74
Day 2: Case is referred, with a balance of $26
Day 2: Warrant is served and the defendant posts the required $100 bond. The judge sets a bond hearing for a distant date, in order to decide whether to apply the bond.
Day 4: The agency pulls the data. Since InitialCollectionsBalance works only by day (not time), we can only report the balance as of the end of the day on which the case was referred. Thus the -$74 balance.
If the bond were taken on Day 3 instead of Day 2, the ICB would've been $26. But the subsequent bond payment would've still run the account to -$74.
This is a fairly unlikely chain of events, but the agency should consider hanging onto all cases with negative balances until a negative payment comes through to zero things out when one of the following things happens:
A refund is issued, or
An unapplied bond is transferred off the case, which is the judge could theoretically do.